"Interaction: The Work Women Do" by Pamela Fishman (1978)

-

JSTOR

No Access
You are not currently logged in through a participating institution or individual account. Seeaccess options for more information.

Interaction: The Work Women Do

Pamela M. Fishman
Social Problems
Vol. 25, No. 4 (Apr., 1978), pp. 397-406
Published by:University of California Press
Article Stable URL:http://www.jstor.org/stable/800492

RIGHTS AND PERMISSIONS

PreviewView Full Screen
GET ACCESS
Page [397] of Social Problems, Vol. 25, No. 4, Apr., 1978
Next PageNext Page
End of preview. Get access to this entire item.
Social Problems © 1978 University of California Press
Abstract:
The paper examines male-female hierarchy in everyday interaction. Beginning with a discussion of the concepts of power and of conversation as negotiated activity, it suggests that successful interaction depends on work by the participants. Using tapes of daily conversations between three male-female couples as data, I present some observations on the ways conversation is controlled as well as the results of transcript analysis. The analysis describes the concrete strategies used by men and women in interaction. Women do more conversational work than men; this is the interactional manifestation of power relations. Finally, some suggestions are made on the importance of studying interactions in the areas of availability and maintenance of one's gender identity.
JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways.
©2000-2011 ITHAKA. All Rights Reserved. JSTOR®, the JSTOR logo, and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA









closeThink you might have access to this content via your library?

Login

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Understanding the Structure and Agency Debate in the Social Sciences by Sherman Tan (2011)

-
Image
UNDERSTANDING THE “STRUCTURE” AND THE “AGENCY” DEBATE IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES (This originally appeared in Habitus [Department of Sociology, Yale University] 2011, 1) Sherman Tan Introduction How should we, as social scientists, best comprehend the nature of social life and orga- nization? Are individuals in control of their own actions and destinies, or are they merely (and unconsciously) subject to particular social circumstances which determine their behavior? In other words, do human beings possess some degree of autonomy over their actions, or are they com- pelled to obey powerful “social forces” which exert control over them? All in all, these conten- tious questions form the basis for what has come to be known as the “structure-agency” debate in the social sciences. These sociological discussions are especially important, given that they are representative of certain (more fundamental) philosophical concerns, for instance, that of free-will, choice, an...
Read more

The Many Interaction Orders: Goffman, Rawls, Smith and the Plural Moral Terrains of Everyday Life (Revised)

-
Image
THE MANY INTERACTION ORDERS:   Goffman, Rawls, Smith and the Plural Moral Terrains of Everyday Life Wayne Martin Mellinger, Ph.D.   Editor’s Note (Updated Version Available): This essay has been substantially revised and expanded. A new, fully developed version— “Many Interaction Orders: Recognition, Inequality, and the Re-specification of Symbolic Interactionism (v.9)” —is now available on this site. The current version remains archived as an earlier draft in the development of this argument. Wayne Martin Mellinger, Ph.D. December 2025 I. WALKING THROUGH MULTIPLE WORLDS The idea came to me not in a library or seminar room but on an ordinary Tuesday afternoon, walking through Ventura after a morning court appearance. Inside the courthouse I had been questioned sharply by a prosecutor and reprimanded by a judge—a ritual drama of authority and submission where every muscle in one's face must be managed with exquisite care. The courtroom is its own dense moral universe:...
Read more

George Herbert Mead and the Making of Symbolic Interactionism (Revised)

-
George Herbert Mead and the Making of Symbolic Interactionism: Expanding the Analysis and Contrasting with Critical Interactionism/EMCA Wayne Martin Mellinger, Ph.D. Part I: Why Mead Still Matters George Herbert Mead (1863–1931) was a foundational figure in American sociology and philosophy whose ideas laid the groundwork for the school of thought known today as symbolic interactionism. Though Mead never published a book in his lifetime, his posthumously compiled lectures, most notably Mind, Self, and Society (1934), shaped the intellectual trajectory of social psychology, microsociology, and interactionist theory. Rooted in the pragmatist tradition and deeply influenced by developments in psychology, philosophy of mind, and evolutionary theory, Mead's work continues to animate contemporary discussions about the social construction of self, meaning, and society. Why This Text Matters for Critical Interactionism For scholars working within Critical Interactionism, Mead repres...
Read more