Reading the News: Toward a Methodology of Critical Textual Analysis by Wayne Martin Mellinger, Ph.D.

 7 January 2025

Reading the News:

Toward a Methodology of 

Critical Textual Analysis

Wayne Martin Mellinger, Ph.D.

Abstract

This essay develops a systematic methodology for the critical textual analysis of news, drawing on ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, framing theory, critical discourse analysis, and the institutional sociology of journalism. News stories do not simply report reality; they actively organize it—assigning relevance, distributing accountability, and shaping the moral intelligibility of events. The methodology outlined here integrates nine analytic dimensions: treating news as account rather than world, frame analysis, attention to textual architecture, analysis of authority and voice, close reading of language, identification of silences, institutional contextualization, comparative reading, and reflexive awareness. The aim is to equip readers with tools that foster empirical discipline, interpretive reflexivity, and civic attentiveness.

Introduction

To "read the news" is never merely to receive information. It is to encounter a selectively constructed narrative about the world, crafted within the constraints of institutional routines, market pressures, political struggles, and culturally sedimented assumptions.¹ News stories do not simply report reality; they actively organize it—assigning relevance, distributing accountability, and shaping the moral intelligibility of events. A critical methodology of textual analysis begins from this recognition. Its task is not to debunk journalism through blanket accusations of bias, nor to cultivate a posture of cynical disbelief, but to make visible the methods by which power, authority, and normality are accomplished in and through news discourse.²

This essay outlines a methodological framework for critically analyzing news texts. Drawing on ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, framing theory, critical discourse analysis, and institutional sociology, it treats journalism as a practical, organized activity and news texts as structured accomplishments.³ The aim is to equip readers with analytic tools that foster empirical discipline, interpretive reflexivity, and civic attentiveness.

1. News as Account, Not World

The first and most fundamental methodological commitment is deceptively simple: news is an account of reality, not reality itself.⁴ This claim does not imply fabrication or deception. Rather, it recognizes journalism as a practice of selection, interpretation, and narrative organization. As Harold Garfinkel argued, social facts are not merely discovered; they are accomplished through members' methods of description and accounting.⁵ News texts are paradigmatic examples of such accounts.

Classic studies in the sociology of news production established this insight decades ago. Harvey Molotch and Marilyn Lester famously described news as "purposive behavior," showing how events become news through institutional routines, strategic interests, and organizational needs.⁶ Similarly, Gaye Tuchman demonstrated that journalistic objectivity functions as a "strategic ritual," protecting news organizations from criticism while structuring what can be said and how.⁷ Mark Fishman's ethnography of newsrooms revealed how reporters' reliance on official "beats" and bureaucratic rhythms systematically shapes coverage.⁸ Herbert Gans showed how assumptions about audience, nation, and social order permeate editorial decisions even when journalists believe themselves to be objective.⁹

From this perspective, the analyst approaches news with disciplined agnosticism. We do not assume neutrality, distortion, or ideological manipulation in advance. We assume craft. The analytic task is to examine how that craft operates: how certain versions of reality are rendered coherent, credible, and morally compelling.¹⁰

2. Framing: What Kind of Story Is Being Told?

Every news story situates events within a recognizable narrative form. This is the work of framing. Frames define what the story is "about," what kind of problem is at stake, and what responses appear reasonable or inevitable.¹¹ Erving Goffman introduced the concept of frames as interpretive schemata that organize experience, while later scholars extended frame analysis to media discourse.¹²

In journalism, frames often operate implicitly. A protest may be framed as a public safety threat, a moral uprising, a logistical disruption, or a democratic expression. Each frame carries with it a causal logic, a moral orientation, and an implied solution.¹³ As Robert Entman argues, framing involves selecting aspects of perceived reality and making them more salient in ways that promote particular problem definitions, causal interpretations, moral evaluations, and treatment recommendations.¹⁴

Todd Gitlin's study of media coverage of the 1960s student movement demonstrated how frames delegitimized protest by emphasizing disorder, violence, and deviance while marginalizing substantive political claims.¹⁵ William Gamson and Andre Modigliani showed how competing "interpretive packages" structure public understanding of contested issues like nuclear power, with different packages emphasizing different aspects of the same phenomena.¹⁶ More recently, scholars have documented how crime, immigration, and economic policy are systematically framed in ways that advantage certain political positions.¹⁷

Methodologically, analysts should ask: What kind of story is this? Is it framed as tragedy, scandal, crime, humanitarian crisis, institutional failure, or political strategy? Who appears as victim, villain, expert, or bystander? What time horizon is implied—sudden rupture or long-standing condition? What causal logic is embedded in the narrative?¹⁸ Frames are powerful precisely because they rarely announce themselves; they quietly shape intelligibility.

3. Textual Architecture: Structure as Meaning

Critical textual analysis attends closely to form, not only content. The architecture of a news story—its headline, lead, sequencing, and closure—produces specific interpretive effects.¹⁹ Headlines often pre-frame interpretation before evidence is encountered; research shows that many readers encounter only headlines, and that headlines shape interpretation even for those who read further.²⁰ Leads function as interpretive anchors, establishing what matters most. Information presented early tends to define the moral landscape within which subsequent details are understood.²¹

Ethnomethodological and conversation-analytic sensibilities are especially valuable here. Although news articles are not conversations, they are sequentially organized texts.²² Emanuel Schegloff showed that sequence is fundamental to meaning-making in interaction; similar principles apply to narrative texts.²³ Early categorizations, causal claims, and source attributions shape what later material can plausibly mean. As Steven Clayman and John Heritage demonstrate in their analysis of news interviews, the placement and formulation of questions constrain the range of acceptable answers.²⁴

The "inverted pyramid" structure of news—placing the most "important" information first—is itself a framing device, not a neutral format.²⁵ Decisions about what counts as most important, whose perspective anchors the lead, and which details are buried in later paragraphs all shape interpretation. Teun van Dijk's detailed analyses of news discourse show how global themes, schematic structures, and local semantic moves work together to produce particular readings.²⁶

Closure is equally consequential. Stories may end with authoritative resolution, lingering ambiguity, or moral exhortation. Each produces a different sense of certainty, urgency, or resignation.²⁷ Structure is not neutral packaging; it is part of the message.

4. Authority and Voice: Who Gets to Define Reality?

Journalistic authority is constructed largely through sourcing practices. Critical analysis examines not only who is quoted, but who qualifies as a legitimate knower.²⁸ Whose voices are granted direct quotation? Who is paraphrased? Who appears only as an object of description or as an anonymous category?

Research consistently shows that institutional actors—government officials, police, corporate spokespeople, credentialed experts—are privileged sources, while marginalized groups are often rendered voiceless or abstracted into statistics.²⁹ Leon Sigal's classic study found that government officials dominated the front pages of major newspapers, while grassroots voices rarely appeared.³⁰ Stuart Hall and his colleagues introduced the concept of "primary definers"—those institutional actors whose statements routinely set the terms for subsequent debate—showing how this structural dependence reproduces dominant frameworks.³¹

Teun van Dijk documents how elite sources dominate news discourse, reproducing existing power relations under the guise of neutrality.³² Dorothy Smith further demonstrates how texts coordinate "ruling relations," organizing social life from the standpoint of institutions rather than lived experience.³³ Clayman and Heritage show how journalists' questioning practices—their use of third-party attributions, adversarial formulations, and turn-taking management—position sources differentially in relation to credibility and accountability.³⁴

Patterns of sourcing are patterns of power. They reveal whose knowledge counts as reality and whose experiences are treated as peripheral or suspect.³⁵

5. Language and the Micro-Politics of Description

Words do not merely describe; they evaluate, categorize, and moralize.³⁶ Critical textual analysis requires close attention to lexical choice and grammatical structure. Van Dijk's extensive research demonstrates how word choice, syntactic structures, and rhetorical devices embed ideological meanings in apparently neutral description.³⁷

Euphemisms and legitimizing language. Official language often softens or obscures violence and responsibility. "Officer-involved shooting" avoids naming police as agents of deadly force; "enhanced interrogation" euphemizes torture; "collateral damage" abstracts civilian deaths.³⁸

Agent deletion. Grammatical constructions that obscure agency ("mistakes were made," "violence erupted," "shots were fired") systematically remove responsible actors from view.³⁹ Van Dijk shows how passive voice and nominalizations are disproportionately used when elite actors might otherwise be held accountable.⁴⁰

Moral adjectives. The same actors may be "violent protesters," "pro-democracy demonstrators," "rioters," "freedom fighters," or "terrorists" depending on political orientation and sympathies being mobilized.⁴¹ Harvey Sacks's work on membership categorization demonstrates that such labels are not neutral descriptions but carry rich "inference-rich" associations about motives, legitimacy, and moral status.⁴² Leila Jayyusi extends this analysis, showing how categories accomplish moral work, establishing "moral space" in which actions can be judged as appropriate or deviant.⁴³

Metaphors. As George Lakoff has shown, metaphors structure political reasoning by mapping complex social issues onto familiar domains—crime as war, immigration as flood, the economy as patient.⁴⁴ Such metaphors naturalize particular policy responses while foreclosing others. Otto Santa Ana's analysis of immigration discourse reveals how metaphors of "flooding," "invasion," and "infestation" dehumanize migrants and justify exclusionary policies.⁴⁵

Attending to language reveals the latent moral order embedded in journalistic description.⁴⁶

6. Silences and Absences

Every news story is defined as much by what it excludes as by what it includes. Critical analysis attends to silences: missing historical context, unasked questions, unrepresented actors, and structural explanations displaced by personal drama.⁴⁷

The concept of structured absence has been developed across several traditions. In ideology critique, it appears in Althusser's notion of the "problematic"—the system of questions a text allows itself to ask, which simultaneously defines what cannot be asked.⁴⁸ In media studies, Herman and Chomsky's "propaganda model" identifies systematic filters—ownership, advertising dependence, sourcing routines, flak, ideological premises—that shape what stories are told and how, producing predictable patterns of omission.⁴⁹

Omission is rarely the result of malice; more often it reflects professional routines, time constraints, and assumptions about audience relevance.⁵⁰ Yet omission is consequential. It narrows the field of the imaginable and renders certain explanations invisible. When crime coverage focuses on individual perpetrators without examining structural conditions, when political coverage treats policy as "horse race" without examining substantive effects, when economic coverage quotes executives and economists but not workers—these absences shape public understanding as powerfully as what is said.⁵¹

As Stuart Hall argued, ideology often operates through what is taken for granted rather than explicitly stated.⁵² Silences are a key mechanism of that operation.

7. News as Institutional Work

Textual analysis must be anchored in institutional sociology. News texts emerge from conditions of work: deadlines, space constraints, commercial imperatives, legal risks, and professional norms such as balance and objectivity.⁵³ Understanding these conditions prevents the naïve conclusion that bias stems from individual bad actors. Instead, bias appears as structured selectivity, produced by the routine organization of newswork itself.⁵⁴

Tuchman's Making News demonstrated that news is not a mirror of events but a product of organizational routines—the "news net" that determines which events are noticed and which are not.⁵⁵ Fishman's Manufacturing the News showed how journalists' reliance on official beats and bureaucratic rhythms produces systematic patterns in what gets covered.⁵⁶ Philip Schlesinger documented how the temporal rhythms of news production—the tyranny of deadlines, the premium on "breaking" news—shape narrative form and sourcing practices.⁵⁷

Contemporary conditions have introduced new dynamics: the collapse of advertising revenue, the rise of digital platforms as intermediaries, the acceleration of news cycles, the fragmentation of audiences into partisan niches, and the erosion of professional autonomy.⁵⁸ These structural shifts must inform how we read the texts that emerge from them.

Critical methodology treats texts as traces of institutional practice.⁵⁹

8. Comparative Reading

No single article is sufficient. Critical methodology relies on comparison: across outlets, political orientations, national contexts, and media forms.⁶⁰ Comparative reading reveals recurring frames, ideological divides, and moments of hegemonic consensus. It also exposes what appears "natural" in one media ecosystem as contingent in another.

Daniel Hallin's analysis of Vietnam War coverage showed how the "sphere of legitimate controversy" shifted over time, with positions once treated as reasonable becoming marginalized and vice versa.⁶¹ Hallin and Mancini's comparative study of media systems demonstrates how journalistic norms, sourcing patterns, and political orientations vary systematically across national contexts.⁶²

Comparison is especially revealing for contested events. Coverage of protests, for example, varies dramatically depending on whether protesters are aligned with or opposed to dominant interests.⁶³ The same physical actions may be framed as "peaceful demonstration" or "violent riot," "free speech" or "disruption," depending on who is doing them and who is reporting. Only comparison makes these patterns visible.⁶⁴

9. Reflexivity: The Reader in the Text

Finally, critical methodology demands reflexivity. Readers bring political commitments, emotional investments, and interpretive habits to every text.⁶⁵ Ethnomethodology insists that we are always already participants in the social worlds we analyze.⁶⁶ The analyst is not a neutral observer but a member of society using the same interpretive competencies as other readers. This is not a contamination to be eliminated but a resource to be acknowledged and examined.⁶⁷

Recognizing our own interpretive predispositions is not a confession of bias; it is a condition of analytic honesty.⁶⁸ Which stories confirm our existing views? Which challenge them? Where do we feel certainty, and should we? What emotions does the text elicit, and how do those emotions shape interpretation?⁶⁹

Reflexivity also means recognizing the social location from which we read. Race, class, gender, nationality, political affiliation, professional training—all shape what we notice and how we interpret.⁷⁰ A methodology that ignores the reader's positionality cannot understand how news actually works in the world.

Conclusion: Reading as Civic Practice

To read the news critically is not a private intellectual exercise; it is a civic practice.⁷¹ Democratic life depends on publics capable of recognizing how authority is constructed, how narratives normalize inequality, and how language organizes moral vision. Critical textual analysis does not promise epistemic purity or ideological escape. It offers something more modest and more demanding: the disciplined work of seeing how reality is being told—and deciding, consciously and collectively, whether we are willing to live within those stories.⁷²

In an era when the shared ground of factual consensus appears to be eroding, when citizens increasingly inhabit separate informational worlds, and when the very possibility of democratic deliberation seems threatened by polarization and distrust, the skills of critical reading become more necessary than ever.⁷³ We cannot simply wish for better journalism; we must become better readers. This essay has offered a framework for that becoming.

Endnotes

1. On news as selective construction within institutional constraints, the foundational texts are Gaye Tuchman, Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality (New York: Free Press, 1978); Herbert Gans, Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time (New York: Pantheon, 1979); Mark Fishman, Manufacturing the News (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1980); and Michael Schudson, The Sociology of News, 2nd ed. (New York: Norton, 2011). The phrase "culturally sedimented assumptions" draws on phenomenological sociology; see Alfred Schutz, The Phenomenology of the Social World, trans. George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967).

2. On making power visible through discourse analysis without descending into cynicism, see Norman Fairclough, Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (London: Longman, 1995); Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, eds., Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, 2nd ed. (London: Sage, 2009). For ethnomethodological approaches that emphasize description over critique while remaining attentive to power, see Michael Lynch, "Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge," Theory, Culture & Society 17, no. 3 (2000): 26-54.

3. On journalism as practical activity, see the sociology of news production tradition: Tuchman, Making News; Fishman, Manufacturing the News; Philip Schlesinger, Putting "Reality" Together: BBC News (London: Constable, 1978). For ethnomethodological approaches to media, see Paul L. Jalbert, ed., Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999).

4. This premise has roots in the sociology of knowledge, particularly Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality (Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966). For its application to journalism, see Tuchman, Making News; Schudson, Sociology of News; Barbie Zelizer, Taking Journalism Seriously: News and the Academy (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004).

5. Harold Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967), especially chapters 1 and 6. On accounts specifically, see Marvin B. Scott and Stanford M. Lyman, "Accounts," American Sociological Review 33, no. 1 (1968): 46-62; John Heritage, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984), chapters 5-6.

6. Harvey Molotch and Marilyn Lester, "News as Purposive Behavior: On the Strategic Use of Routine Events, Accidents, and Scandals," American Sociological Review 39, no. 1 (1974): 101-112. See also their "Accidental News: The Great Oil Spill as Local Occurrence and National Event," American Journal of Sociology 81, no. 2 (1975): 235-260.

7. Gaye Tuchman, "Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of Objectivity," American Journal of Sociology 77, no. 4 (1972): 660-679. The concept has been widely influential; see Dan Berkowitz, "Doing Double Duty: Paradigm Repair and the Princess Diana What-a-Story," Journalism 1, no. 2 (2000): 125-143; Michael Schudson, "The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism," Journalism 2, no. 2 (2001): 149-170.

8. Mark Fishman, Manufacturing the News (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1980). Fishman's concept of the "bureaucratic affinity" between news organizations and official sources remains essential.

9. Herbert Gans, Deciding What's News (New York: Pantheon, 1979). Gans identified "enduring values" in news—ethnocentrism, altruistic democracy, responsible capitalism, small-town pastoralism, individualism, moderatism—that structure coverage regardless of individual journalists' intentions.

10. On the analyst's stance of "disciplined agnosticism" or "methodological indifference," see Garfinkel and Sacks's original formulation in Harold Garfinkel and Harvey Sacks, "On Formal Structures of Practical Actions," in Theoretical Sociology, ed. John C. McKinney and Edward A. Tiryakian (New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970), 337-366. For discussion, see John Heritage, "Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk," in Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. Kristine L. Fitch and Robert E. Sanders (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2005), 103-147.

11. The literature on framing in media studies is vast. For overviews, see Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant, eds., Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001); Paul D'Angelo and Jim A. Kuypers, eds., Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives (New York: Routledge, 2010); Dietram A. Scheufele, "Framing as a Theory of Media Effects," Journal of Communication 49, no. 1 (1999): 103-122.

12. Erving Goffman, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (New York: Harper & Row, 1974), 21. For extensions to media, see Todd Gitlin, The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980); William A. Gamson, Talking Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).

13. On how frames structure causal reasoning and moral evaluation, see Shanto Iyengar, Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991); Shanto Iyengar and Donald R. Kinder, News That Matters: Television and American Opinion (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987).

14. Robert M. Entman, "Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm," Journal of Communication 43, no. 4 (1993): 52. See also Robert M. Entman, Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004).

15. Gitlin, Whole World Is Watching. Gitlin showed how media frames trivialized, polarized, and marginalized the New Left, emphasizing internal conflict and theatrical protest while ignoring substantive political analysis.

16. William A. Gamson and Andre Modigliani, "Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach," American Journal of Sociology 95, no. 1 (1989): 1-37. Their concept of "interpretive packages" combines frames with reasoning devices, metaphors, exemplars, catchphrases, and visual images.

17. On crime framing, see Ray Surette, Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice: Images, Realities, and Policies, 5th ed. (Stamford, CT: Cengage, 2015). On immigration, see Otto Santa Ana, Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002). On economic policy, see Dean Starkman, The Watchdog That Didn't Bark: The Financial Crisis and the Disappearance of Investigative Journalism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014).

18. For systematic approaches to frame analysis, see Reese et al., Framing Public Life; D'Angelo and Kuypers, Doing News Framing Analysis; Claes H. de Vreese, "News Framing: Theory and Typology," Information Design Journal 13, no. 1 (2005): 51-62.

19. On textual architecture and interpretive effects, see Teun A. van Dijk, News as Discourse (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988), chapters 2-3; Teun A. van Dijk, News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988).

20. On headlines, see van Dijk, News as Discourse, chapter 5; Ullrich Ecker et al., "The Effects of Subtle Misinformation in News Headlines," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 20, no. 4 (2014): 323-335. Research on headline-only reading is documented in Nic Newman et al., Reuters Institute Digital News Report (Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, annual editions).

21. On leads as interpretive anchors, see Carl Warren, Modern News Reporting, 3rd ed. (New York: Harper & Row, 1959); van Dijk, News as Discourse, chapter 3.

22. On applying conversation-analytic sensibilities to written texts, see Jalbert, Media Studies; Alec McHoul, Telling How Texts Talk: Essays on Reading and Ethnomethodology (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982).

23. Emanuel A. Schegloff, Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007). For foundational work on sequence, see Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson, "A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation," Language 50, no. 4 (1974): 696-735.

24. Steven E. Clayman and John Heritage, The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), especially chapters 4-5. See also John Heritage and David Greatbatch, "On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews," in Talk and Social Structure, ed. Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991), 93-137.

25. On the inverted pyramid as a framing device with historical origins, see Kevin G. Barnhurst and John Nerone, The Form of News: A History (New York: Guilford Press, 2001); Michael Schudson, Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers (New York: Basic Books, 1978).

26. Van Dijk, News as Discourse; van Dijk, News Analysis. Van Dijk's framework distinguishes between "macrostructures" (global themes and schematic organization) and "microstructures" (local semantic and syntactic features), showing how both contribute to ideological effects.

27. On narrative closure in news, see S. Elizabeth Bird and Robert W. Dardenne, "Myth, Chronicle, and Story: Exploring the Narrative Qualities of News," in Media, Myths, and Narratives: Television and the Press, ed. James W. Carey (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988), 67-86.

28. On sourcing as construction of authority, see Leon V. Sigal, Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking (Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 1973); Richard V. Ericson, Patricia M. Baranek, and Janet B. L. Chan, Negotiating Control: A Study of News Sources (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989).

29. The literature on source bias is extensive. See Sigal, Reporters and Officials; Gans, Deciding What's News; W. Lance Bennett, "Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States," Journal of Communication 40, no. 2 (1990): 103-127; Robert M. Entman, "Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents," Journal of Communication 41, no. 4 (1991): 6-27.

30. Sigal, Reporters and Officials. Sigal found that nearly half of front-page stories in the New York Times and Washington Post relied on official proceedings, press releases, or press conferences as their primary source.

31. Stuart Hall, Chas Critcher, Tony Jefferson, John Clarke, and Brian Roberts, Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order (London: Macmillan, 1978), 57-60. The concept of primary definers has been widely influential and debated; see Philip Schlesinger, "Rethinking the Sociology of Journalism: Source Strategies and the Limits of Media-Centrism," in Public Communication: The New Imperatives, ed. Marjorie Ferguson (London: Sage, 1990), 61-83.

32. Teun A. van Dijk, Racism and the Press (London: Routledge, 1991); Teun A. van Dijk, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach (London: Sage, 1998); Teun A. van Dijk, Discourse and Power (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

33. Dorothy E. Smith, The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990); Dorothy E. Smith, Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People (Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2005); Dorothy E. Smith, "Textually Mediated Social Organization," International Social Science Journal 36, no. 1 (1984): 59-75.

34. Clayman and Heritage, News Interview, chapters 6-7. See also Steven E. Clayman, "From Talk to Text: Newspaper Accounts of Reporter-Source Interactions," Media, Culture & Society 12, no. 1 (1990): 79-103.

35. For empirical demonstrations, see Daniel Hallin, The "Uncensored War": The Media and Vietnam (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986); Entman, Projections of Power; W. Lance Bennett, Regina G. Lawrence, and Steven Livingston, When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007).

36. On language and ideology, see Michael Billig, Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology (London: Sage, 1991); Margaret Wetherell and Jonathan Potter, Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992); Norman Fairclough, Language and Power (London: Longman, 1989).

37. Van Dijk, News as Discourse; van Dijk, Ideology; van Dijk, Discourse and Power. Van Dijk's analytical framework examines lexical style, syntactic patterns, rhetorical figures, and semantic moves as carriers of ideological meaning.

38. On euphemism in official and media language, see George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language," Horizon 13, no. 76 (1946): 252-265; William Lutz, Doublespeak: From "Revenue Enhancement" to "Terminal Living" (New York: Harper & Row, 1989); Geoffrey Nunberg, Talking Right: How Conservatives Turned Liberalism into a Tax-Raising, Latte-Drinking, Sushi-Eating, Volvo-Driving, New York Times-Reading, Body-Piercing, Hollywood-Loving, Left-Wing Freak Show (New York: PublicAffairs, 2006).

39. On agent deletion and grammatical obscuring of responsibility, see van Dijk, News as Discourse, chapter 4; M.A.K. Halliday, An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd ed. (London: Arnold, 2004); Roger Fowler, Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press (London: Routledge, 1991).

40. Van Dijk, News Analysis, chapter 6. See also Roger Fowler, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew, Language and Control (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979).

41. On the politics of naming protesters and political actors, see Pamela J. Shoemaker, "Media Treatment of Deviant Political Groups," Journalism Quarterly 61, no. 1 (1984): 66-82; James Hertog and Douglas McLeod, "A Multiperspectival Approach to Framing Analysis: A Field Guide," in Framing Public Life, ed. Reese et al., 139-161.

42. Harvey Sacks, "On the Analyzability of Stories by Children," in Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, ed. John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972), 325-345; Harvey Sacks, Lectures on Conversation, 2 vols., ed. Gail Jefferson (Oxford: Blackwell, 1992). For extensions, see Stephen Hester and Peter Eglin, eds., Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis (Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1997); Elizabeth Stokoe, "Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis," Discourse Studies 14, no. 3 (2012): 277-303.

43. Leila Jayyusi, Categorization and the Moral Order (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984). See also Lena Jayyusi, "Values and Moral Judgment: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order," in Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, ed. Graham Button (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 227-251.

44. George Lakoff, Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate, 2nd ed. (White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green, 2014); George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Metaphors We Live By (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980). For extensions to political discourse, see Jonathan Charteris-Black, Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, 2nd ed. (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).

45. Santa Ana, Brown Tide Rising. See also Leo R. Chavez, Covering Immigration: Popular Images and the Politics of the Nation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001).

46. On the moral order in discourse, see Jayyusi, Categorization and the Moral Order; van Dijk, Ideology; Billig, Ideology and Opinions.

47. On structured silence and absence in media, see Noam Chomsky, Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies (Boston: South End Press, 1989); Robert A. Hackett, "Decline of a Paradigm? Bias and Objectivity in News Media Studies," Critical Studies in Mass Communication 1, no. 3 (1984): 229-259.

48. Louis Althusser, "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses," in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. Ben Brewster (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971), 127-186; Pierre Macherey, A Theory of Literary Production, trans. Geoffrey Wall (London: Routledge, 1978). The concept of "problematic" refers to the structured system of concepts that defines what questions can be posed within a theoretical framework.

49. Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky, Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media (New York: Pantheon, 1988). For critical assessments and extensions, see Jeffery Klaehn, ed., The Political Economy of Media and Power (New York: Peter Lang, 2010); Pedro Jacobo Aguado, "Herman and Chomsky's Propaganda Model: A Critical Descriptive Analysis," Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico 24, no. 2 (2018): 1153-1172.

50. On how professional routines produce omission, see Tuchman, Making News; Fishman, Manufacturing the News; Schlesinger, Putting "Reality" Together. These studies demonstrate that omission is typically structural rather than intentional.

51. On specific patterns of omission, see Surette, Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice (on crime); Thomas E. Patterson, Out of Order (New York: Knopf, 1993) (on horse-race political coverage); Starkman, Watchdog That Didn't Bark (on economic coverage).

52. Stuart Hall, "The Rediscovery of 'Ideology': Return of the Repressed in Media Studies," in Culture, Society and the Media, ed. Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran, and Janet Woollacott (London: Methuen, 1982), 56-90. Hall's insight that ideology operates through "common sense" rather than explicit argument draws on Gramsci; see Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith (New York: International Publishers, 1971).

53. On the conditions of news production, see Tuchman, Making News; Fishman, Manufacturing the News; Schlesinger, "Newsmen and Their Time-Machine," British Journal of Sociology 28, no. 3 (1977): 336-350; Pamela J. Shoemaker and Stephen D. Reese, Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective, 3rd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2014).

54. The phrase "structured selectivity" draws on Bob Jessop's use of the term in political theory; see Bob Jessop, State Theory: Putting the Capitalist State in Its Place (Cambridge: Polity, 1990). For application to media, see Daniel C. Hallin, "The Media, the War in Vietnam, and Political Support: A Critique of the Thesis of an Oppositional Media," Journal of Politics 46, no. 1 (1984): 2-24.

55. Tuchman, Making News, chapter 2. The "news net" is Tuchman's metaphor for how the spatial and temporal organization of news-gathering determines which events are caught and which slip through.

56. Fishman, Manufacturing the News.

57. Schlesinger, Putting "Reality" Together; Schlesinger, "Newsmen and Their Time-Machine."

58. On contemporary transformations in news production, see Robert W. McChesney, Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy (New York: New Press, 2013); Emily Bell and Taylor Owen, "The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley Reengineered Journalism," Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University, 2017; Pablo J. Boczkowski, News at Work: Imitation in an Age of Information Abundance (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010).

59. On texts as traces of practice, see Smith, Conceptual Practices of Power; Smith, Institutional Ethnography.

60. On comparative media analysis, see Daniel C. Hallin and Paolo Mancini, Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004); Silvio Waisbord, Reinventing Professionalism: Journalism and News in Global Perspective (Cambridge: Polity, 2013); Rodney Benson and Erik Neveu, eds., Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field (Cambridge: Polity, 2005).

61. Hallin, "Uncensored War". Hallin's concept of the "spheres" of consensus, legitimate controversy, and deviance has been highly influential in understanding how news defines the boundaries of acceptable discourse.

62. Hallin and Mancini, Comparing Media Systems.

63. On differential coverage of protests, see Gitlin, Whole World Is Watching; Hertog and McLeod, "Multiperspectival Approach"; Sarah Sobieraj, Soundbitten: The Perils of Media-Centered Political Activism (New York: New York University Press, 2011); Deana A. Rohlinger, "Friends and Foes: Media, Politics, and Tactics in the Abortion War," Social Problems 49, no. 1 (2002): 91-113.

64. For examples of comparative protest analysis, see Jules Boykoff, Beyond Bullets: The Suppression of Dissent in the United States (Oakland, CA: AK Press, 2007); Todd Gitlin, "Public Sphere or Public Sphericules?," in Media, Ritual and Identity, ed. Tamar Liebes and James Curran (London: Routledge, 1998), 168-174.

65. On reflexivity in qualitative research, see Pierre Bourdieu and Loïc Wacquant, An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992); Donna Haraway, "Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective," Feminist Studies 14, no. 3 (1988): 575-599.

66. On the analyst as member, see Garfinkel, Studies in Ethnomethodology; George Psathas, Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995); Paul ten Have, Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide, 2nd ed. (London: Sage, 2007).

67. On using membership as a resource rather than contamination, see Heritage, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology, chapter 10; Lynch, "Against Reflexivity."

68. On positionality and analytic honesty, see Sandra Harding, Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991); Patricia Hill Collins, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2000).

69. On emotional responses to media, see W. Lance Bennett and Shanto Iyengar, "A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication," Journal of Communication 58, no. 4 (2008): 707-731; Marcus Prior, Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

70. On how social location shapes interpretation, see Haraway, "Situated Knowledges"; Stuart Hall, "Encoding/Decoding," in Culture, Media, Language, ed. Stuart Hall et al. (London: Hutchinson, 1980), 128-138; David Morley, The "Nationwide" Audience (London: British Film Institute, 1980).

71. On critical reading as civic practice, see Paolo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, trans. Myra Bergman Ramos (New York: Continuum, 1970); Henry A. Giroux, Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture, and Schooling (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997); bell hooks, Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom (New York: Routledge, 1994).

72. On reality as contested terrain, see Hall, "Rediscovery of 'Ideology'"; Gramsci, Prison Notebooks; Stuart Hall, "The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees," in Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, ed. David Morley and Kuan-Hsing Chen (London: Routledge, 1996), 25-46.

73. On polarization and epistemic crisis, see Yochai Benkler, Robert Faris, and Hal Roberts, Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018); Eli Pariser, The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You (New York: Penguin, 2011); Cass R. Sunstein, Republic.com 2.0 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007); C. Thi Nguyen, "Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles," Episteme 17, no. 2 (2020): 141-161.

Bibliography

Althusser, Louis. "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses." In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, translated by Ben Brewster, 127-186. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1971.

Barnhurst, Kevin G., and John Nerone. The Form of News: A History. New York: Guilford Press, 2001.

Bell, Emily, and Taylor Owen. "The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley Reengineered Journalism." Tow Center for Digital Journalism, Columbia University, 2017.

Benkler, Yochai, Robert Faris, and Hal Roberts. Network Propaganda: Manipulation, Disinformation, and Radicalization in American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Bennett, W. Lance. "Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States." Journal of Communication 40, no. 2 (1990): 103-127.

Bennett, W. Lance, Regina G. Lawrence, and Steven Livingston. When the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.

Benson, Rodney, and Erik Neveu, eds. Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity, 2005.

Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.

Billig, Michael. Ideology and Opinions: Studies in Rhetorical Psychology. London: Sage, 1991.

Bird, S. Elizabeth, and Robert W. Dardenne. "Myth, Chronicle, and Story: Exploring the Narrative Qualities of News." In Media, Myths, and Narratives: Television and the Press, edited by James W. Carey, 67-86. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988.

Boczkowski, Pablo J. News at Work: Imitation in an Age of Information Abundance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2010.

Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc Wacquant. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

Chavez, Leo R. Covering Immigration: Popular Images and the Politics of the Nation. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.

Chomsky, Noam. Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. Boston: South End Press, 1989.

Clayman, Steven E. "From Talk to Text: Newspaper Accounts of Reporter-Source Interactions." Media, Culture & Society 12, no. 1 (1990): 79-103.

Clayman, Steven E., and John Heritage. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

Collins, Patricia Hill. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 2000.

D'Angelo, Paul, and Jim A. Kuypers, eds. Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 2010.

de Vreese, Claes H. "News Framing: Theory and Typology." Information Design Journal 13, no. 1 (2005): 51-62.

Entman, Robert M. "Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm." Journal of Communication 43, no. 4 (1993): 51-58.

Entman, Robert M. "Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents." Journal of Communication 41, no. 4 (1991): 6-27.

Entman, Robert M. Projections of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2004.

Ericson, Richard V., Patricia M. Baranek, and Janet B. L. Chan. Negotiating Control: A Study of News Sources. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1989.

Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman, 1995.

Fairclough, Norman. Language and Power. London: Longman, 1989.

Fishman, Mark. Manufacturing the News. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1980.

Fowler, Roger. Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge, 1991.

Fowler, Roger, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress, and Tony Trew. Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979.

Freire, Paolo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Translated by Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Continuum, 1970.

Gamson, William A. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

Gamson, William A., and Andre Modigliani. "Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power: A Constructionist Approach." American Journal of Sociology 95, no. 1 (1989): 1-37.

Gans, Herbert. Deciding What's News: A Study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon, 1979.

Garfinkel, Harold. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1967.

Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks. "On Formal Structures of Practical Actions." In Theoretical Sociology, edited by John C. McKinney and Edward A. Tiryakian, 337-366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1970.

Giroux, Henry A. Pedagogy and the Politics of Hope: Theory, Culture, and Schooling. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997.

Gitlin, Todd. The Whole World Is Watching: Mass Media in the Making and Unmaking of the New Left. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980.

Goffman, Erving. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.

Gramsci, Antonio. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith. New York: International Publishers, 1971.

Hall, Stuart. "Encoding/Decoding." In Culture, Media, Language, edited by Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis, 128-138. London: Hutchinson, 1980.

Hall, Stuart. "The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees." In Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, edited by David Morley and Kuan-Hsing Chen, 25-46. London: Routledge, 1996.

Hall, Stuart. "The Rediscovery of 'Ideology': Return of the Repressed in Media Studies." In Culture, Society and the Media, edited by Michael Gurevitch, Tony Bennett, James Curran, and Janet Woollacott, 56-90. London: Methuen, 1982.

Hall, Stuart, Chas Critcher, Tony Jefferson, John Clarke, and Brian Roberts. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan, 1978.

Halliday, M.A.K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed. London: Arnold, 2004.

Hallin, Daniel C. The "Uncensored War": The Media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.

Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.

Haraway, Donna. "Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective." Feminist Studies 14, no. 3 (1988): 575-599.

Harding, Sandra. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.

Heritage, John. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984.

Heritage, John, and David Greatbatch. "On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews." In Talk and Social Structure, edited by Deirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, 93-137. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.

Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon, 1988.

Hertog, James, and Douglas McLeod. "A Multiperspectival Approach to Framing Analysis: A Field Guide." In Framing Public Life, edited by Stephen D. Reese, Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant, 139-161. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.

Hester, Stephen, and Peter Eglin, eds. Culture in Action: Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: University Press of America, 1997.

hooks, bell. Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge, 1994.

Iyengar, Shanto. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Jalbert, Paul L., ed. Media Studies: Ethnomethodological Approaches. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1999.

Jayyusi, Leila. Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.

Jayyusi, Lena. "Values and Moral Judgment: Communicative Praxis as Moral Order." In Ethnomethodology and the Human Sciences, edited by Graham Button, 227-251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Klaehn, Jeffery, ed. The Political Economy of Media and Power. New York: Peter Lang, 2010.

Lakoff, George. Don't Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. 2nd ed. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green, 2014.

Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.

Lutz, William. Doublespeak: From "Revenue Enhancement" to "Terminal Living". New York: Harper & Row, 1989.

Lynch, Michael. "Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge." Theory, Culture & Society 17, no. 3 (2000): 26-54.

McChesney, Robert W. Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning the Internet Against Democracy. New York: New Press, 2013.

McHoul, Alec. Telling How Texts Talk: Essays on Reading and Ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1982.

Molotch, Harvey, and Marilyn Lester. "Accidental News: The Great Oil Spill as Local Occurrence and National Event." American Journal of Sociology 81, no. 2 (1975): 235-260.

Molotch, Harvey, and Marilyn Lester. "News as Purposive Behavior: On the Strategic Use of Routine Events, Accidents, and Scandals." American Sociological Review 39, no. 1 (1974): 101-112.

Morley, David. The "Nationwide" Audience. London: British Film Institute, 1980.

Nguyen, C. Thi. "Echo Chambers and Epistemic Bubbles." Episteme 17, no. 2 (2020): 141-161.

Nunberg, Geoffrey. Talking Right: How Conservatives Turned Liberalism into a Tax-Raising, Latte-Drinking, Sushi-Eating, Volvo-Driving, New York Times-Reading, Body-Piercing, Hollywood-Loving, Left-Wing Freak Show. New York: PublicAffairs, 2006.

Orwell, George. "Politics and the English Language." Horizon 13, no. 76 (1946): 252-265.

Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin, 2011.

Patterson, Thomas E. Out of Order. New York: Knopf, 1993.

Prior, Marcus. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Psathas, George. Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.

Reese, Stephen D., Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant, eds. Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2001.

Rohlinger, Deana A. "Friends and Foes: Media, Politics, and Tactics in the Abortion War." Social Problems 49, no. 1 (2002): 91-113.

Sacks, Harvey. Lectures on Conversation. 2 vols. Edited by Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.

Sacks, Harvey. "On the Analyzability of Stories by Children." In Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication, edited by John J. Gumperz and Dell Hymes, 325-345. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. "A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation." Language 50, no. 4 (1974): 696-735.

Santa Ana, Otto. Brown Tide Rising: Metaphors of Latinos in Contemporary American Public Discourse. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2002.

Schegloff, Emanuel A. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Scheufele, Dietram A. "Framing as a Theory of Media Effects." Journal of Communication 49, no. 1 (1999): 103-122.

Schlesinger, Philip. "Newsmen and Their Time-Machine." British Journal of Sociology 28, no. 3 (1977): 336-350.

Schlesinger, Philip. Putting "Reality" Together: BBC News. London: Constable, 1978.

Schlesinger, Philip. "Rethinking the Sociology of Journalism: Source Strategies and the Limits of Media-Centrism." In Public Communication: The New Imperatives, edited by Marjorie Ferguson, 61-83. London: Sage, 1990.

Schudson, Michael. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books, 1978.

Schudson, Michael. "The Objectivity Norm in American Journalism." Journalism 2, no. 2 (2001): 149-170.

Schudson, Michael. The Sociology of News. 2nd ed. New York: Norton, 2011.

Schutz, Alfred. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Translated by George Walsh and Frederick Lehnert. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1967.

Scott, Marvin B., and Stanford M. Lyman. "Accounts." American Sociological Review 33, no. 1 (1968): 46-62.

Shoemaker, Pamela J. "Media Treatment of Deviant Political Groups." Journalism Quarterly 61, no. 1 (1984): 66-82.

Shoemaker, Pamela J., and Stephen D. Reese. Mediating the Message in the 21st Century: A Media Sociology Perspective. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge, 2014.

Sigal, Leon V. Reporters and Officials: The Organization and Politics of Newsmaking. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 1973.

Smith, Dorothy E. The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1990.

Smith, Dorothy E. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 2005.

Smith, Dorothy E. "Textually Mediated Social Organization." International Social Science Journal 36, no. 1 (1984): 59-75.

Sobieraj, Sarah. Soundbitten: The Perils of Media-Centered Political Activism. New York: New York University Press, 2011.

Starkman, Dean. The Watchdog That Didn't Bark: The Financial Crisis and the Disappearance of Investigative Journalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014.

Stokoe, Elizabeth. "Moving Forward with Membership Categorization Analysis: Methods for Systematic Analysis." Discourse Studies 14, no. 3 (2012): 277-303.

Sunstein, Cass R. Republic.com 2.0. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Surette, Ray. Media, Crime, and Criminal Justice: Images, Realities, and Policies. 5th ed. Stamford, CT: Cengage, 2015.

ten Have, Paul. Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2007.

Tuchman, Gaye. Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press, 1978.

Tuchman, Gaye. "Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of Objectivity." American Journal of Sociology 77, no. 4 (1972): 660-679.

van Dijk, Teun A. Discourse and Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

van Dijk, Teun A. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage, 1998.

van Dijk, Teun A. News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.

van Dijk, Teun A. News as Discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1988.

van Dijk, Teun A. Racism and the Press. London: Routledge, 1991.

Waisbord, Silvio. Reinventing Professionalism: Journalism and News in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Polity, 2013.

Wetherell, Margaret, and Jonathan Potter. Mapping the Language of Racism: Discourse and the Legitimation of Exploitation. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.

Wodak, Ruth, and Michael Meyer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Sage, 2009.

Zelizer, Barbie. Taking Journalism Seriously: News and the Academy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2004.